<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Users Are The Safest</title>
	<link>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/</link>
	<description>Giorgio Maone's answers to the Web, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-9200</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-9200</guid>
		<description>@&lt;b&gt;Show your boxes with color or border&lt;/b&gt;:
Here we're talking about making upgrades as seamless as possible for the majority of users, i.e. those who install software in its default location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<b>Show your boxes with color or border</b>:<br />
Here we&#8217;re talking about making upgrades as seamless as possible for the majority of users, i.e. those who install software in its default location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Show your boxes with color or border</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-9199</link>
		<dc:creator>Show your boxes with color or border</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-9199</guid>
		<description>In fact, if you install FF in any folder other than Program Files, you do NOT need to be an administrator, also with Opera 9.5, you MUST be an administrator, as Opera 9.5 now insists on installing an .ocx and 2 .dll files in the Windows folder (annoying and COMPLETELY unecessary, and in fact LESS secure than when you could install Opera any damn foler you wanted and all its files would only go in THAT folder).  Learn Windows, Georgio, you do not know that much about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, if you install FF in any folder other than Program Files, you do NOT need to be an administrator, also with Opera 9.5, you MUST be an administrator, as Opera 9.5 now insists on installing an .ocx and 2 .dll files in the Windows folder (annoying and COMPLETELY unecessary, and in fact LESS secure than when you could install Opera any damn foler you wanted and all its files would only go in THAT folder).  Learn Windows, Georgio, you do not know that much about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franco</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8630</link>
		<dc:creator>franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 06:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8630</guid>
		<description>Giorgio, you are doing a great job to make firefox a safer browser and I've often thought to switch back to it (I've been a Phoenix 0.2 user) just for NoScript. But Opera is simply a better browser. Leaner, smoother, ecc..
As for the survey, there's a logical error in it. 
Most updated could only mean more secure INSIDE ITS family. Any other conclusion outside it can be drawn only taking into account the specific vulnerabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giorgio, you are doing a great job to make firefox a safer browser and I&#8217;ve often thought to switch back to it (I&#8217;ve been a Phoenix 0.2 user) just for NoScript. But Opera is simply a better browser. Leaner, smoother, ecc..<br />
As for the survey, there&#8217;s a logical error in it.<br />
Most updated could only mean more secure INSIDE ITS family. Any other conclusion outside it can be drawn only taking into account the specific vulnerabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8594</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8594</guid>
		<description>Alright, sorry for not typing the 0.01.
Firefox is nice, which many of its extensions e.g. Firebug and Fireftp are very useful.
But I want to point out that, I hate some of the firefox fanboys try to advertise Firefox by pissing off the others (and it isn't true),
which is really a bad attitude, and I think the atmosphere in Opera is much better.
Everyone has they way of browsing, which I prefer Opera.
(There are also fanboys for Opera in Opera community, operawatch and more)

p.s. Opera does also has anti XSS-like extension
http://adn.exofire.net/stuff/arioso.js</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, sorry for not typing the 0.01.<br />
Firefox is nice, which many of its extensions e.g. Firebug and Fireftp are very useful.<br />
But I want to point out that, I hate some of the firefox fanboys try to advertise Firefox by pissing off the others (and it isn&#8217;t true),<br />
which is really a bad attitude, and I think the atmosphere in Opera is much better.<br />
Everyone has they way of browsing, which I prefer Opera.<br />
(There are also fanboys for Opera in Opera community, operawatch and more)</p>
<p>p.s. Opera does also has anti XSS-like extension<br />
<a href="http://adn.exofire.net/stuff/arioso.js" rel="nofollow">http://adn.exofire.net/stuff/arioso.js</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8591</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8591</guid>
		<description>@&lt;b&gt;Adrian&lt;/b&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Can you find any critical vulnerability on Opera 9.5?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote cite="http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/windows/951/#security"&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/windows/951/#security" rel="nofollow"&gt;Opera 9.51 Changelog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Changes from 9.5&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Fixed an issue where &#60;canvas&#62; functions could reveal data from random places in memory, as reported by Philip Taylor. See our advisory.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Fixed an issue that could be used to &lt;strong&gt;execute arbitrary code&lt;/strong&gt;, as reported by Billy Rios. Details will be disclosed at a later date.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Security status is now correctly set when navigating from HTTP to HTTPS.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Corrected an issue related to OCSP and CRLs that would lower security.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And yes, Firefox users are safer &lt;em&gt;also because&lt;/em&gt; NoScript is available for Firefox: XSS is everywhere and most browser vulnerabilities, no matter the vendor, are exploitable either through JavaScript or plugins...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<b>Adrian</b>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Can you find any critical vulnerability on Opera 9.5?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote cite="http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/windows/951/#security">
<h3><a href="http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/windows/951/#security" rel="nofollow">Opera 9.51 Changelog</a></h3>
<p><strong>Changes from 9.5</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Fixed an issue where &lt;canvas&gt; functions could reveal data from random places in memory, as reported by Philip Taylor. See our advisory.</li>
<li>Fixed an issue that could be used to <strong>execute arbitrary code</strong>, as reported by Billy Rios. Details will be disclosed at a later date.</li>
<li>Security status is now correctly set when navigating from HTTP to HTTPS.</li>
<li>Corrected an issue related to OCSP and CRLs that would lower security.</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p>And yes, Firefox users are safer <em>also because</em> NoScript is available for Firefox: XSS is everywhere and most browser vulnerabilities, no matter the vendor, are exploitable either through JavaScript or plugins&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8589</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8589</guid>
		<description>Most updated != Safe &#38;&#38; having a lot of firefox fanboy != safe

Opera's probably doing a better job in security.(can you find any critical vulnerability on Opera 9.5 ?)

Firefox does even have vulnerability problem on the day they release 3.0.
http://dvlabs.tippingpoint.com/blog/2008/06/18/vulnerability-in-mozilla-firefox-30
Yea, problem doesn't affect NoScript. So does it means Firefox sucks without extensions ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most updated != Safe &amp;&amp; having a lot of firefox fanboy != safe</p>
<p>Opera&#8217;s probably doing a better job in security.(can you find any critical vulnerability on Opera 9.5 ?)</p>
<p>Firefox does even have vulnerability problem on the day they release 3.0.<br />
<a href="http://dvlabs.tippingpoint.com/blog/2008/06/18/vulnerability-in-mozilla-firefox-30" rel="nofollow">http://dvlabs.tippingpoint.com/blog/2008/06/18/vulnerability-in-mozilla-firefox-30</a><br />
Yea, problem doesn&#8217;t affect NoScript. So does it means Firefox sucks without extensions ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8588</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8588</guid>
		<description>@&lt;b&gt;Adrian&lt;/b&gt;:
you realize (don't you?) that the HACKERS you're pointing at (0x000000) is just Ronald, whose love for Mozilla is well known &lt;a href="#comment-8459" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<b>Adrian</b>:<br />
you realize (don&#8217;t you?) that the HACKERS you&#8217;re pointing at (0&#215;000000) is just Ronald, whose love for Mozilla is well known <a href="#comment-8459" rel="nofollow">here</a> :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8587</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8587</guid>
		<description>Most updated != Safe

And lets see what HACKERS think about it:

http://www.0x000000.com/?i=592</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most updated != Safe</p>
<p>And lets see what HACKERS think about it:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.0x000000.com/?i=592" rel="nofollow">http://www.0&#215;000000.com/?i=592</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8570</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8570</guid>
		<description>Not sure what version of Opera you use, but I get alerts when a new version of Opera is available.

@Giorgio, well I didn't know Opera was vulnerable to it. I have hunch that it was a variant of the bug, Usually I test all browsers when I find some quirky thing, this time I didn't try Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what version of Opera you use, but I get alerts when a new version of Opera is available.</p>
<p>@Giorgio, well I didn&#8217;t know Opera was vulnerable to it. I have hunch that it was a variant of the bug, Usually I test all browsers when I find some quirky thing, this time I didn&#8217;t try Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewC</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8509</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2008/07/01/firefox-users-are-the-safest/#comment-8509</guid>
		<description>This is probably partly influenced by Gmail, Google Docs and Youtube's annoying habit of often not working properly in Opera when the user agent is set to Opera. This causes many Opera users to set their user agent to Firefox for all Google related sites, although there are user javacript fixes for these issues. That being said, I have noticed that the available stats for many websites show an alarmingly large number of  Opera users do use outdated versions, some extremely outdated. Is opening the help menu and clicking &#34;Check for updates&#34; really that hard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably partly influenced by Gmail, Google Docs and Youtube&#8217;s annoying habit of often not working properly in Opera when the user agent is set to Opera. This causes many Opera users to set their user agent to Firefox for all Google related sites, although there are user javacript fixes for these issues. That being said, I have noticed that the available stats for many websites show an alarmingly large number of  Opera users do use outdated versions, some extremely outdated. Is opening the help menu and clicking &quot;Check for updates&quot; really that hard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
