<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meet ABE</title>
	<link>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/</link>
	<description>Giorgio Maone's answers to the Web, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: ant</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13954</link>
		<dc:creator>ant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13954</guid>
		<description>After wasting days looking for ways to minimise favicon.ico logspam, I think this time I'll just be rolling out an IP ban script instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After wasting days looking for ways to minimise favicon.ico logspam, I think this time I&#8217;ll just be rolling out an IP ban script instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirdarckcat</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13707</link>
		<dc:creator>sirdarckcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 06:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13707</guid>
		<description>hey!

I think there's a small bug on the spec, on the Examples section:
 
Accept POST SUBDOC from SELF https://secure.somesite.com

Maybe that must be SUB (without the DOC), I guess that's from when we were discussing about the SUBREQ stuff :P

Greetz!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey!</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s a small bug on the spec, on the Examples section:</p>
<p>Accept POST SUBDOC from SELF <a href="https://secure.somesite.com" rel="nofollow">https://secure.somesite.com</a></p>
<p>Maybe that must be SUB (without the DOC), I guess that&#8217;s from when we were discussing about the SUBREQ stuff :P</p>
<p>Greetz!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nan M</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13646</link>
		<dc:creator>Nan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13646</guid>
		<description>Having a more secured router,  from a trusted provider, and one that I know is providing round-the-clock support, is something a home user wouldn't have dared to imagine a couple of years ago, unless they had completed a networking qualification themselves.

Much appreciation here from your Western Australian fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a more secured router,  from a trusted provider, and one that I know is providing round-the-clock support, is something a home user wouldn&#8217;t have dared to imagine a couple of years ago, unless they had completed a networking qualification themselves.</p>
<p>Much appreciation here from your Western Australian fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hackademix.net » ABE Warnings Everywhere OMG!</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13612</link>
		<dc:creator>hackademix.net » ABE Warnings Everywhere OMG!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13612</guid>
		<description>[...] Meet ABE      01 07 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Meet ABE      01 07 2009 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GµårÐïåñ</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13606</link>
		<dc:creator>GµårÐïåñ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13606</guid>
		<description>Congrats my friend and I am sure the community will benefit greatly from your countless hours of hard work. It was an honor to be involved in any testing and support and will continue to look forward to more great contributions from you to the community. Get some rest, its well deserved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats my friend and I am sure the community will benefit greatly from your countless hours of hard work. It was an honor to be involved in any testing and support and will continue to look forward to more great contributions from you to the community. Get some rest, its well deserved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox firewall voor veilig interbankieren &#124; Lost in the Noise</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13586</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox firewall voor veilig interbankieren &#124; Lost in the Noise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13586</guid>
		<description>[...] te beschermen en te voorkomen dat ze door kwaadaardige websites worden misbruikt”, zegt Giorgio Maone, ontwikkelaar van [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] te beschermen en te voorkomen dat ze door kwaadaardige websites worden misbruikt”, zegt Giorgio Maone, ontwikkelaar van [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom T.</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13585</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13585</guid>
		<description>Giorgio, congratulations on fathering your http://hackademix.net/2009/02/09/maone-20-released/ second child this year! However, rude as it is to correct one's superiors, I must say that I felt privileged, rather than a &#34;victim&#34;, to have played any small part in the development and testing of ABE. Please forgive me for contradicting you in public. :-) :-) 

Warmest regards,
Tom T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giorgio, congratulations on fathering your <a href="http://hackademix.net/2009/02/09/maone-20-released/" rel="nofollow">http://hackademix.net/2009/02/09/maone-20-released/</a> second child this year! However, rude as it is to correct one&#8217;s superiors, I must say that I felt privileged, rather than a &quot;victim&quot;, to have played any small part in the development and testing of ABE. Please forgive me for contradicting you in public. :-) :-) </p>
<p>Warmest regards,<br />
Tom T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blabulius Küngelstein</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13581</link>
		<dc:creator>Blabulius Küngelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13581</guid>
		<description>@Steuard
Giorgio answered at
http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&#38;t=1631#p5911</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steuard<br />
Giorgio answered at<br />
<a href="http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&amp;t=1631#p5911" rel="nofollow">http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&amp;t=1631#p5911</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steuard</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13578</link>
		<dc:creator>Steuard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2009/06/30/meet-abe/#comment-13578</guid>
		<description>Is it really a good idea to hard-code a filename for site-specific rulesets?  I know there was some frustration and fuss when MSIE introduced the default location for favicon.ico; it seems like it could be better to avoid that here.  I'd think that pointing to the appropriate file via some sort of META or LINK tag in the web page's header would be both better behaved and more flexible.  (Otherwise, this is yet another file that every web browser will request from every site on every visit.  And does this work for sites where the owner doesn't control the entire host but just a subdirectory?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really a good idea to hard-code a filename for site-specific rulesets?  I know there was some frustration and fuss when MSIE introduced the default location for favicon.ico; it seems like it could be better to avoid that here.  I&#8217;d think that pointing to the appropriate file via some sort of META or LINK tag in the web page&#8217;s header would be both better behaved and more flexible.  (Otherwise, this is yet another file that every web browser will request from every site on every visit.  And does this work for sites where the owner doesn&#8217;t control the entire host but just a subdirectory?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
