http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/ Giorgio Maone's answers to the Web, the Universe, and Everything Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:44:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-23112 The EFF releases new HTTPS Everywhere Firefox extension | ZDNet Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:55:22 +0000 http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-23112 [...] worth pointing out is that, forced SSL connections (STS support in both, NoScript and HTTPS Everywhere), as well as the additional security added by Secure Cookie Management, has [...] […] worth pointing out is that, forced SSL connections (STS support in both, NoScript and HTTPS Everywhere), as well as the additional security added by Secure Cookie Management, has […]

]]> http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-22556 Security in Depth: New Security Features « Twit Browser Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:22:16 +0000 http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-22556 [...] In addition to being in Google Chrome 4, Strict-Transport-Security has also been implemented in NoScript, a security add-on for Firefox, and a native implementation is underway in Firefox. A number of [...] […] In addition to being in Google Chrome 4, Strict-Transport-Security has also been implemented in NoScript, a security add-on for Firefox, and a native implementation is underway in Firefox. A number of […]

]]> http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-21758 Security in Depth: New Security Features – 21th Edition | Chrome Secrets Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:12:05 +0000 http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-21758 [...] In addition to being in Google Chrome 4, Strict-Transport-Security has also been implemented in NoScript, a security add-on for Firefox, and a native implementation is underway in Firefox. A number of [...] […] In addition to being in Google Chrome 4, Strict-Transport-Security has also been implemented in NoScript, a security add-on for Firefox, and a native implementation is underway in Firefox. A number of […]

]]> http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-21078 Chrome中5大安全增强 « Chrome Blog Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:39:55 +0000 http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-21078 [...] 目前，Paypal实现了该特征。Chrome 4也实现了STS，此外还有Firefox的安全插件 NoScript，它也拥有相同的功能。FireFox自身的STS实现正在进行当中。 [...] […] 目前，Paypal实现了该特征。Chrome 4也实现了STS，此外还有Firefox的安全插件 NoScript，它也拥有相同的功能。FireFox自身的STS实现正在进行当中。 […]

]]> http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-20885 Kayce Obenshain Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:03:53 +0000 http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-20885 There is surely plenty to recognize concerning this. I do think you put together good quality points in Features of security issues too. I still use XP and believe still most stable version. Keep doing the great job! There is surely plenty to recognize concerning this. I do think you put together good quality points in Features of security issues too. I still use XP and believe still most stable version. Keep doing the great job!

]]> http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-20239 Look For A New Revision Of Chrome Soon ~ Revelations From An Unwashed Brain Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:45:06 +0000 http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-20239 [...] provide extra security against snooping, although it’s not bullet-proof. It’s already implemented in NoScript and a native Firefox implementation is being worked on. Some security-conscious web sites, [...] […] provide extra security against snooping, although it’s not bullet-proof. It’s already implemented in NoScript and a native Firefox implementation is being worked on. Some security-conscious web sites, […]

]]> http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-16481 hackademix.net » Google Talk Badges vs X-Frame-Options Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:15:50 +0000 http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-16481 [...] Google playing the early adopter of bleeding edge security technologies like X-Frame-Options or STS, both in its browser and in its web properties, is really great because it speeds up their [...] […] Google playing the early adopter of bleeding edge security technologies like X-Frame-Options or STS, both in its browser and in its web properties, is really great because it speeds up their […]

]]> http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-15889 hackademix.net » PayPal is Safer with NoScript Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:22:59 +0000 http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-15889 [...] Strict Transport Security (STS) has gone live on PayPal yesterday. [...] […] Strict Transport Security (STS) has gone live on PayPal yesterday. […]

]]> http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-15592 Giorgio Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:52:44 +0000 http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-15592 @<a href="http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-15554" rel="nofollow">evden eve nakliyat</a>: Yes, just turn the <b>noscript.STS.enabled</b> about:config preference to false. @evden eve nakliyat:
Yes, just turn the noscript.STS.enabled about:config preference to false.

]]> http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-15554 evden eve nakliyat Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:08:49 +0000 http://hackademix.net/2009/09/23/strict-transport-security-in-noscript/#comment-15554 Hii .. Is this function optional (e.g. can user enable\disable it)?? Hii .. Is this function optional (e.g. can user enable\disable it)??

]]>