<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote NoScript Best Security Add-On 2010</title>
	<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/</link>
	<description>Giorgio Maone's answers to the Web, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-21923</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-21923</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Thank you for devising this extension for firefox. I am running firefox version 3 on both windows xp and ubuntu 7.10 Linux. I tried to vote but the votes have closed. dont worry about &#34;about.com&#34; they are one of the good guys you can allow it as a trusted domain in noscript.

Cheers,
Steven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thank you for devising this extension for firefox. I am running firefox version 3 on both windows xp and ubuntu 7.10 Linux. I tried to vote but the votes have closed. dont worry about &quot;about.com&quot; they are one of the good guys you can allow it as a trusted domain in noscript.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Steven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CS</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-21503</link>
		<dc:creator>CS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-21503</guid>
		<description>... whoops. My bad (forgot to temporarily re-allow about.com).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; whoops. My bad (forgot to temporarily re-allow about.com).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CS</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-21501</link>
		<dc:creator>CS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-21501</guid>
		<description>WTF? Is it just me or is NoScript not on the the list of finalists any more? Last time I checked it was, and it was winning by miles? Or have I missed something...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF? Is it just me or is NoScript not on the the list of finalists any more? Last time I checked it was, and it was winning by miles? Or have I missed something&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noscripter</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20970</link>
		<dc:creator>noscripter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20970</guid>
		<description>Argggghhhhh I don't know what to decide.  NoScript or LastPass. They've both treated me very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argggghhhhh I don&#8217;t know what to decide.  NoScript or LastPass. They&#8217;ve both treated me very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basti</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20571</link>
		<dc:creator>Basti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20571</guid>
		<description>Ironically WOT encouraged me to vote for it, but I voted for NoScript. Well NoScript protects me from bad (actually all) JavaScripts and XSS-Attacks and clickjacking. WOT gives an overview about a site's trustworthiness, what's a good thing, but doesn't help when someone breaks into the site or if user content is allowed. WOT and MCAfee  Site Advisor can give you a false feeling of security. I dropped the Site Advisor and use WOT.

WOT covers known problems. WOT for checking if an web-store is safe to buy from. To check if a download site is safe by default (it's not guaranteed that's always clean). To see if a distributor of software keeps what he promises. (e.g back-door free, really using AES and not a pseudo encryption.. etc) NoScript doesn't cover that, because it just can't.

NoSript covers known and unknown problems. NoScript blocks JavaScript and plugins (Java, Flash etc) plus HTML5 audio/video, because it can be bad. It detects Clickjacking and prevents it. It blocks XSS-Attacks and enforces ABE. WOT can't do that, because it just can't.

Both are useful for it's tasks, but for me NoScript deserves to be the winner.

BTW.: The same poll asks for the best browser and Opera users seem to vote more then others do. BTW II: Does someone give something on such polls? BTW III: NoScript is the most recommended add-on everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically WOT encouraged me to vote for it, but I voted for NoScript. Well NoScript protects me from bad (actually all) JavaScripts and XSS-Attacks and clickjacking. WOT gives an overview about a site&#8217;s trustworthiness, what&#8217;s a good thing, but doesn&#8217;t help when someone breaks into the site or if user content is allowed. WOT and MCAfee  Site Advisor can give you a false feeling of security. I dropped the Site Advisor and use WOT.</p>
<p>WOT covers known problems. WOT for checking if an web-store is safe to buy from. To check if a download site is safe by default (it&#8217;s not guaranteed that&#8217;s always clean). To see if a distributor of software keeps what he promises. (e.g back-door free, really using AES and not a pseudo encryption.. etc) NoScript doesn&#8217;t cover that, because it just can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>NoSript covers known and unknown problems. NoScript blocks JavaScript and plugins (Java, Flash etc) plus HTML5 audio/video, because it can be bad. It detects Clickjacking and prevents it. It blocks XSS-Attacks and enforces ABE. WOT can&#8217;t do that, because it just can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Both are useful for it&#8217;s tasks, but for me NoScript deserves to be the winner.</p>
<p>BTW.: The same poll asks for the best browser and Opera users seem to vote more then others do. BTW II: Does someone give something on such polls? BTW III: NoScript is the most recommended add-on everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dian</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20464</link>
		<dc:creator>Dian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20464</guid>
		<description>Just voted NoScript, Good Luck!
and allowed NoScript for this site 
to fill the comment :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just voted NoScript, Good Luck!<br />
and allowed NoScript for this site<br />
to fill the comment :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Canuck</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20463</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20463</guid>
		<description>@ Giorgio: Its IP based.
Time to proxy cycle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Giorgio: Its IP based.<br />
Time to proxy cycle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: computerfreaker</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20441</link>
		<dc:creator>computerfreaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20441</guid>
		<description>NoScript's winning by a mile - w00t!

NoScript: 61% (774 votes)
WOT: 24% (315 votes)
LastPass Password Manager: 9% (126 votes)
BetterPrivacy: 2% (36 votes)
FoxyProxy: 0% (10 votes)

How long does voting last?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NoScript&#8217;s winning by a mile - w00t!</p>
<p>NoScript: 61% (774 votes)<br />
WOT: 24% (315 votes)<br />
LastPass Password Manager: 9% (126 votes)<br />
BetterPrivacy: 2% (36 votes)<br />
FoxyProxy: 0% (10 votes)</p>
<p>How long does voting last?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GµårÐïåñ</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20433</link>
		<dc:creator>GµårÐïåñ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20433</guid>
		<description>Done, good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done, good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Poses Biggest Security Threat to Businesses – PC World &#124; .:: MrCoi Blog ::.</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20432</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Poses Biggest Security Threat to Businesses – PC World &#124; .:: MrCoi Blog ::.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/02/02/vote-noscript-best-security-add-on-2010/#comment-20432</guid>
		<description>[...] hackademix.net » Vote NoScript Best Security Add-On 2010 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] hackademix.net » Vote NoScript Best Security Add-On 2010 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

