<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X-Frame-Options (Finally) on (Vanilla) Firefox</title>
	<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/</link>
	<description>Giorgio Maone's answers to the Web, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-24048</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-24048</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href="http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-24047" rel="nofollow"&gt;KWierso&lt;/a&gt;:
Already "fixed" (more precisely, hacked away) in &lt;a href="http://noscript.net/getit#devel" rel="nofollow"&gt;latest development build&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-24047" rel="nofollow">KWierso</a>:<br />
Already &#8220;fixed&#8221; (more precisely, hacked away) in <a href="http://noscript.net/getit#devel" rel="nofollow">latest development build</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KWierso</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-24047</link>
		<dc:creator>KWierso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 04:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-24047</guid>
		<description>Huh. Seems like NoScript's preventing Firefox 4's addon manager's &#34;Get Addons&#34; section from displaying, due to x-frame-options set on services.addons.mozilla.org.

Mozilla themselves had to work around this in bug 593387: 
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593387</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. Seems like NoScript&#8217;s preventing Firefox 4&#8217;s addon manager&#8217;s &quot;Get Addons&quot; section from displaying, due to x-frame-options set on services.addons.mozilla.org.</p>
<p>Mozilla themselves had to work around this in bug 593387:<br />
<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593387" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593387</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23994</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23994</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href="http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23991" rel="nofollow"&gt;p0deje&lt;/a&gt;:
I'll drop X-Frame-Options support when I'll drop support for Firefox 3.6.x, which won't probably happen for one year at least.

Regarding Origin, consensus on how it should work has formed only recently, and Firefox implementation is on its way, hence I'm not sure investing on it would be worth the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23991" rel="nofollow">p0deje</a>:<br />
I&#8217;ll drop X-Frame-Options support when I&#8217;ll drop support for Firefox 3.6.x, which won&#8217;t probably happen for one year at least.</p>
<p>Regarding Origin, consensus on how it should work has formed only recently, and Firefox implementation is on its way, hence I&#8217;m not sure investing on it would be worth the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p0deje</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23991</link>
		<dc:creator>p0deje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23991</guid>
		<description>Do you plan to drop X-Frame-Options support in future?
By the way, why there is no Origin HTTP header implementation in NoScript?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you plan to drop X-Frame-Options support in future?<br />
By the way, why there is no Origin HTTP header implementation in NoScript?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23797</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23797</guid>
		<description>NoScript is always one step two years ahead :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NoScript is always one step two years ahead :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23786</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23786</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href="http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23778" rel="nofollow"&gt;anon&lt;/a&gt;:
I've got no need to do it -- yet.
If the point you want to make is that CSP is considerably more complex than X-Frame-Options, I agree, and this can actually hinder its adoption. But it's obviously much more powerful, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23778" rel="nofollow">anon</a>:<br />
I&#8217;ve got no need to do it &#8212; yet.<br />
If the point you want to make is that CSP is considerably more complex than X-Frame-Options, I agree, and this can actually hinder its adoption. But it&#8217;s obviously much more powerful, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23778</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 03:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/08/31/x-frame-options-finally-on-vanilla-firefox/#comment-23778</guid>
		<description>try converting this site into CSP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>try converting this site into CSP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

