<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet Another Adobe Flash Painful Update</title>
	<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/</link>
	<description>Giorgio Maone's answers to the Web, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: xyloth</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24146</link>
		<dc:creator>xyloth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24146</guid>
		<description>thank you so fuckin much. Adobe sucked that time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you so fuckin much. Adobe sucked that time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omnibus</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24113</link>
		<dc:creator>Omnibus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24113</guid>
		<description>Thank you sooooo much Giorgio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you sooooo much Giorgio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert`</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24104</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24104</guid>
		<description>Linux distributions perfected patch management years ago with yum and aptitude.  All of my Linux systems update automatically by monitoring the Linux repository hosted at Adobe.com.  When a new version of AcrobatReader or Adobe flash-plugin is posted, yum-updatesd downloads and installs it.  If yum-updatesd is off, all you have to do is su -c &#34;yum -y update&#34;.  There is also a GUI based prompt for updates.  Software downloads, Installations, Updates, and Uninstalls is so antiquated on Windows.  Under windows it is the same process i used 30 years ago.  Under Linux, it is all automated.


$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/adobe-linux-i386.repo 

[adobe-linux-i386]

name=Adobe Systems Incorporated

baseurl=http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/

enabled=1

gpgcheck=1

gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-adobe-linux</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux distributions perfected patch management years ago with yum and aptitude.  All of my Linux systems update automatically by monitoring the Linux repository hosted at Adobe.com.  When a new version of AcrobatReader or Adobe flash-plugin is posted, yum-updatesd downloads and installs it.  If yum-updatesd is off, all you have to do is su -c &quot;yum -y update&quot;.  There is also a GUI based prompt for updates.  Software downloads, Installations, Updates, and Uninstalls is so antiquated on Windows.  Under windows it is the same process i used 30 years ago.  Under Linux, it is all automated.</p>
<p>$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/adobe-linux-i386.repo </p>
<p>[adobe-linux-i386]</p>
<p>name=Adobe Systems Incorporated</p>
<p>baseurl=http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/</p>
<p>enabled=1</p>
<p>gpgcheck=1</p>
<p>gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-adobe-linux</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24040</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 02:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24040</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the link sir. It solved my problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the link sir. It solved my problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24027</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24027</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href="http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24026" rel="nofollow"&gt;Unanimous Howard&lt;/a&gt;:
Some Solaris/Sparc, some YDL/PowerPC, some Maemo/ARM.
May I ask you why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24026" rel="nofollow">Unanimous Howard</a>:<br />
Some Solaris/Sparc, some YDL/PowerPC, some Maemo/ARM.<br />
May I ask you why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unanimous Howard</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24026</link>
		<dc:creator>Unanimous Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-24026</guid>
		<description>What's your experience using non-x86/amd64 machines with BSD or UNIX systems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s your experience using non-x86/amd64 machines with BSD or UNIX systems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passageguy</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-23999</link>
		<dc:creator>passageguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-23999</guid>
		<description>Thx for the direct link dude ,i have the same prob ,this getPlusPlus piss me off, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx for the direct link dude ,i have the same prob ,this getPlusPlus piss me off, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not So Prod IE User</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-23997</link>
		<dc:creator>Not So Prod IE User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 03:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-23997</guid>
		<description>I know this thread is for firefox-users but for IE Users just add _ax and you will get the IE-version (if you dont understand just change install_flash_player.exe for install_flash_player_ax.exe in the link provided by maone)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this thread is for firefox-users but for IE Users just add _ax and you will get the IE-version (if you dont understand just change install_flash_player.exe for install_flash_player_ax.exe in the link provided by maone)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faust</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-23996</link>
		<dc:creator>Faust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 01:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-23996</guid>
		<description>FYI, I've gotten weary of always trying to track down the direct link, so I now just resort to using filehippo.com, which always seems to have the latest files within 24 hrs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, I&#8217;ve gotten weary of always trying to track down the direct link, so I now just resort to using filehippo.com, which always seems to have the latest files within 24 hrs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yamaban</title>
		<link>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-23995</link>
		<dc:creator>yamaban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hackademix.net/2010/09/21/yet-another-adobe-flash-painful-update/#comment-23995</guid>
		<description>For the people out there in what of a 64bit version: Adobe offers a new beta called Square P1 (10.2.161.22)at Adobe-Labs: 
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
Download-links:
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
Notes:
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/flashplayer_square_p1_releasenotes.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the people out there in what of a 64bit version: Adobe offers a new beta called Square P1 (10.2.161.22)at Adobe-Labs:<br />
<a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/" rel="nofollow">http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/</a><br />
Download-links:<br />
<a href="http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html" rel="nofollow">http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html</a><br />
Notes:<br />
<a href="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/flashplayer_square_p1_releasenotes.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/flashplayer_square_p1_releasenotes.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

